What is Microsoft NPS?

What is Microsoft NPS (Network Policy Server)? 

Microsoft Network Policy Server (NPS) is an aging and rigid solution that often feels outdated and overly complex for modern network access control needs, particularly when paired with today’s cloud-centric environments like Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD). The glaring issue with NPS is its lack of seamless integration with Entra ID, which is increasingly becoming the cornerstone for identity management in many organizations. Instead of supporting this newer cloud-based identity model, NPS stubbornly clings to traditional on-premise Active Directory (AD), making it feel like a relic in hybrid or cloud environments.

What are some key issues with Microsoft NPS? 

Key Issues with Microsoft NPS:

1. Incompatibility with Entra ID:
   • NPS relies heavily on on-prem AD for authentication and doesn’t natively integrate with Microsoft Entra ID. This lack of support makes it difficult to implement modern, cloud-based identity and access management solutions without workarounds or third-party tools, adding unnecessary complexity.

2. Complex and Error-Prone Configuration:

1. • Configuring NPS is a tedious and cumbersome process. Its outdated and clunky interface makes even simple tasks feel overly complicated, often leading to misconfigurations. There’s a steep learning curve for new administrators, and even seasoned IT professionals find themselves wrestling with NPS’s intricate policy setup.

3. Poor Support for Modern Authentication Protocols:

1. • NPS struggles with modern authentication protocols used in cloud-based environments, forcing organizations to rely on legacy systems like PEAP and MS-CHAPv2, which don’t align well with the zero-trust security models that modern environments require.

4. Limited Flexibility:

1. • NPS’s rigid design lacks the flexibility to accommodate diverse authentication needs. It doesn’t handle complex access control scenarios well, particularly in dynamic, cloud-based environments where Entra ID excels. This limits its usefulness for organizations looking for scalable, future-proof solutions.

5. Inconsistent Cloud Integration:

1. • NPS requires extensive workarounds to interact with cloud services and lacks out-of-the-box compatibility with Microsoft Entra ID, meaning companies often have to rely on unreliable, ad-hoc solutions or bridge services like Azure AD Domain Services, which further complicates deployment.

Microsoft NPS feels like a legacy solution stuck in a world that’s rapidly moving towards cloud-based identity management. Its poor compatibility with Entra ID, combined with its arcane configuration process and lack of flexibility, makes it an increasingly impractical choice for organizations aiming for modern, efficient, and scalable network access control.

Is Microsoft NPS deprecated? 

Is Microsoft NPS Deprecated?

While Microsoft Network Policy Server (NPS) has not been officially deprecated, it feels like a forgotten and neglected product in the rapidly evolving world of modern network security. It remains stagnant, with minimal updates over the years, which suggests that Microsoft is no longer prioritizing its development. As organizations move towards cloud-based solutions like Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD), NPS increasingly feels like an outdated and cumbersome relic.

Key Problems:

1. Lack of Innovation: NPS hasn’t kept up with modern security trends or protocols, leaving organizations stuck with outdated methods like MS-CHAPv2, which are less secure compared to more modern authentication approaches. This neglect reflects Microsoft’s apparent lack of interest in evolving NPS to meet today’s needs.
2. Incompatibility with Cloud Solutions: In a world where cloud services and hybrid networks are the norm, NPS’s reliance on on-premises Active Directory (AD) makes it feel archaic. It doesn’t integrate natively with Microsoft Entra ID, forcing businesses to rely on awkward and often unreliable workarounds to enable cloud identity services. This puts NPS in direct conflict with the modern, scalable, and flexible solutions that businesses expect today.
3. Cumbersome Configuration and Management: NPS continues to rely on a clunky, outdated interface, making configuration complex and error-prone. It feels abandoned compared to Microsoft’s newer, more user-friendly cloud offerings. Admins often face frustration trying to implement NPS, particularly when configuring it for hybrid or modern environments.
4. No Clear Roadmap: Microsoft has shown no indication of a meaningful roadmap for NPS improvements. It remains trapped in the past, while Microsoft’s focus clearly lies on more modern identity solutions like Microsoft Entra ID and Azure ADConditional Access.

While Microsoft may not have formally deprecated NPS, its stagnation, lack of cloud-native support, and outdated interface signal that it is no longer a priority. For businesses looking to stay competitive and secure, NPS increasingly feels like a burden, out of touch with the demands of modern network security.

How does Portnox compare with Microsoft NPS? 

Portnox offers a far superior solution compared to Microsoft Network Policy Server (NPS), particularly for organizations looking for modern, cloud-native network access control (NAC). Microsoft NPS, rooted in outdated, on-premise infrastructure, pales in comparison to the agility, scalability, and ease of use that Portnox provides. Here’s why Portnox stands head and shoulders above NPS:

1. Cloud-Native Architecture

• Portnox: Built from the ground up with a cloud-native architecture, Portnox eliminates the need for cumbersome on-premises hardware or complex configurations. It leverages the cloud to deliver real-time scalability, ensuring that businesses of any size can easily deploy and manage their NAC solution with minimal IT overhead.
• Microsoft NPS: NPS, on the other hand, remains stuck in an on-prem world, requiring dedicated servers and manual configurations that feel clunky and outdated in today’s cloud-first environments. Its lack of cloud-native capabilities means it struggles to adapt to the demands of modern, dynamic networks.

2. Seamless Integration with Modern Identity Solutions

• Portnox: Portnox seamlessly integrates with Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD) and other cloud identity providers. This allows businesses to quickly and efficiently manage access control policies without the need for clunky workarounds. The platform’s smooth interoperability with cloud-based identity solutions makes it ideal for hybrid and fully cloud environments.
• Microsoft NPS: NPS, by contrast, is heavily dependent on on-premises Active Directory, offering poor support for cloud-based identity services like Entra ID. Businesses are forced to implement convoluted and unreliable configurations to get NPS to function in cloud environments, creating unnecessary headaches and security gaps.

3. Simplified Management and User Experience

• Portnox: With its intuitive, user-friendly interface, Portnox drastically simplifies the setup and management of network access policies. The platform automates key functions such as certificate management, posture assessments, and compliance enforcement, ensuring that even smaller IT teams can easily manage network security without deep technical expertise.
• Microsoft NPS: In contrast, NPS is notorious for its complex and antiquated interface. Admins are forced to spend excessive time configuring policies and troubleshooting errors. The lack of modern automation in NPS increases administrative overhead and leads to frequent misconfigurations that can compromise network security.

4. Superior Scalability and Flexibility

• Portnox: As a cloud-based solution, Portnox offers unparalleled scalability. Whether you’re a small business or a global enterprise, Portnox can grow with your needs without requiring additional hardware or expensive infrastructure upgrades. New locations, users, and devices can be added seamlessly, and security policies can be deployed instantly across the entire network.
• Microsoft NPS: Scaling NPS is a challenge. Adding new users or extending the solution to multiple sites requires significant hardware investments, additional server setups, and more complicated configurations. NPS struggles to meet the demands of growing businesses, especially in distributed or hybrid environments.

5. Comprehensive, Automated Security Posture Assessment

• Portnox: Portnox excels in performing real-time posture assessments for both managed and unmanaged devices. It ensures that devices meet security requirements before granting access, reducing the risk of threats like malware or unauthorized access. Its automated remediation features also ensure that non-compliant devices are handled quickly without manual intervention.
• Microsoft NPS: NPS offers only basic NAC functionality and lacks robust posture assessment and remediation capabilities. Organizations are forced to manually enforce security checks and manage non-compliant devices, leaving significant gaps in network security.

6. Lower Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)

• Portnox: With its cloud-based deployment model, Portnox significantly reduces the total cost of ownership by eliminating the need for dedicated on-premises hardware, constant updates, and maintenance. It also reduces administrative overhead through automation, making it a highly cost-effective solution.
• Microsoft NPS: NPS requires ongoing investments in on-premises hardware, labor-intensive management, and frequent updates to remain secure. The associated costs of maintaining and scaling an NPS environment can quickly outstrip its initial savings, making it a less cost-effective solution in the long run.

7. Future-Proof, Cloud-Driven Security

• Portnox: As a cloud-native solution, Portnox is constantly evolving to meet the latest security challenges. It regularly rolls out updates and new features with no disruption to service, ensuring that businesses always have the most up-to-date protection against emerging threats.
• Microsoft NPS: NPS, in contrast, has received few meaningful updates in recent years. Its lack of modern features and poor alignment with cloud security practices suggest that it’s increasingly being left behind as organizations move to more advanced, cloud-based solutions.

Conclusion:

Portnox is the clear choice for modern network access control, offering a cloud-native, scalable, and easy-to-use solution that integrates effortlessly with cloud identity systems like Microsoft Entra ID. Microsoft NPS, in contrast, is an outdated, on-premises solution that struggles with the demands of modern networks, offering limited cloud compatibility, clunky management, and high overhead. For businesses looking to secure their networks efficiently and future-proof their security infrastructure, Portnox is the superior option.

Related Reading

Strengthening IoT Security with Cloud-Native DHCP Listening

By Kate Asaff | January 14, 2023

Enhanced IoT Fingerprinting & Security with Cloud-Native DHCP Listening More Like the Internet of Everything With the explosion of new devices connecting to the internet, IoT (or, the Internet of Things) really might as well be called IoE (or, the Internet of Everything.) The use cases for always-connected devices span across industries – from facilities… Read More →

How to Prevent IoT from Ruining Your Life

By Kate Asaff | May 30, 2023

One of the worst things you can go through as a company is a data breach. It costs a small fortune (average of $4.35 million as of 2022), destroys your reputation, often leads to bankruptcy, and takes a massive toll on your employee’s well-being. Thus, preventing a data breach should be top of your to-do list. Today, that means taking a hard look at your connected endpoints – starting with IoT – and making sure you have the necessary tools to keep them from putting you at risk.  Read More →

The Security Compliance Conundrum: Adapting to the Era of IoT, Hybrid Work & AI

By Michael Marvin | July 25, 2023

The rise of the Internet of Things (IoT), the adoption of hybrid work models, and the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) have revolutionized the way organizations operate. As we embrace the endless possibilities brought by these technological advancements, we must also confront the complex challenges they present, especially concerning security compliance. In an era where… Read More →